Baseball Toaster Mike's Baseball Rants
Help
This is my site with my opinions, but I hope that, like Irish Spring, you like it, too.
Frozen Toast
Search
Google Search
Web
Toaster
Mike's Baseball Rants
Archives

2009
01 

2008
10  09  07 
06  05  04  03 

2007
12  11  10  09  08  07 
06  05  04  03  02  01 

2006
12  11  10  09  08  07 
06  05  04  03  02  01 

2005
12  11  10  09  08  07 
06  05  04  03  02  01 

2004
12  11  10  09  08  07 
06  05  04  03  02  01 

2003
12  11  10  09  08  07 
06  05  04  03  02  01 

2002
12  11  10  09  08  07 
Links to MBBR
Swing and Sway with Dr. K
2003-05-09 01:29
by Mike Carminati

ESPN's lead story on their baseball site is about how well pitchers are hitting this season. A total of ten home runs has been hit by pitchers so far this season. It probably would go unnoticed but for the fact that it exceeds the Tigers' total for April by one dinger. Tim Kurkjian writes that "pitchers are getting better as hitters." He supports his point with the top hitting pitchers based on 12 at-bats. Twelve at-bats? That's three games. I find that a bit of a small sample myself.

Part I: Overall Pitcher-Batters

Kirkjian continues:

Pitcher's hit because today's baseball culture is all about hitting. It has been that way for 10 years. All over the country, kids are going to batting cages and relentlessly pumping tokens into pitching machines.

I'm sorry, but wasn't just a year or two ago that the popular cry was that pitchers couldn't even bunt anymore, and the designated hitter should become universal? Is this simply the media poucing on an aberration to rid the majors of the DH menace? Couldn't this just be an meaningless, early-season aberration?

I thought I would find out if there was something to the theory. Here is a table of pitcher battings stats per decade (for all players who pitched exclusively or at least appeared in more than 2 games to filter out position players throwing mop-up innings):

Decade	BA	OBP	SLUG	OPS	HR/AB
1870s	.247	.261	.300	.561	0.14%
1880s	.227	.267	.300	.567	0.52%
1890s	.227	.285	.298	.583	0.50%
1900s	.187	.230	.236	.466	0.25%
1910s	.183	.232	.234	.466	0.30%
1920s	.205	.246	.262	.507	0.47%
1930s	.194	.235	.244	.478	0.47%
1940s	.180	.223	.221	.444	0.37%
1950s	.169	.216	.219	.434	0.69%
1960s	.144	.185	.186	.371	0.63%
1970s	.150	.190	.190	.380	0.51%
1980s	.146	.182	.186	.368	0.45%
1990s	.145	.181	.182	.364	0.38%
2000s	.146	.179	.189	.368	0.54%

Apparently due to specialization, pitchers went from acceptable hitters early on very quickly to poor ones by the turn of the century, and finally by the Sixties to the horrendous ones that they are today. I find little to support the contention that pitchers have started to hit better in the last ten years. Their stats in the Nineties and the current decade (whatever we call it) are almost identical. Home run numbers are up, but one must wonder if that is just due to the increase in homers being today.

Let's check out the number above represented as percentages of the overall stats for all players, something akin to Baseball-Reference's adjusted stats (except we don't have the time to adjust all of the stats by park before summing):

Decade	BA%	OBP%	SLUG%	OPS%	HR/AB%
1870s	91.94%	92.50%	90.01%	91.15%	63.08%
1880s	90.19%	89.63%	88.80%	89.19%	84.63%
1890s	82.54%	82.64%	80.76%	81.67%	70.34%
1900s	73.67%	73.96%	71.95%	72.93%	61.87%
1910s	71.71%	72.21%	69.24%	70.69%	58.55%
1920s	71.88%	70.91%	65.96%	68.27%	40.40%
1930s	69.55%	68.53%	61.07%	64.51%	29.88%
1940s	69.06%	67.24%	60.19%	63.54%	24.49%
1950s	65.28%	65.12%	55.85%	60.10%	27.71%
1960s	57.77%	58.83%	49.77%	53.91%	26.17%
1970s	58.61%	58.80%	50.32%	54.24%	23.21%
1980s	56.54%	56.36%	47.93%	51.76%	19.05%
1990s	54.93%	54.37%	44.48%	48.92%	13.56%
2000s	55.09%	53.28%	44.23%	48.22%	16.71%

Actually, the home run numbers in the Aughts have gone up slightly relative to the overall home run frequency, but it is still the second-lowest decade. It just happens to follow the Nineties, the lowest decade.

However, it may be something that is being masking by viewing the data per decade. Maybe if we looked at the last thirty years, we would find more to support pitchers' improvement at the plate:

Year	BA	OBP	SLUG	OPS	HR/AB
1970	.146	.188	.192	.380	0.72%
1971	.149	.189	.188	.377	0.63%
1972	.146	.185	.184	.368	0.51%
1973	.150	.191	.189	.380	0.57%
1974	.165	.208	.204	.412	0.38%
1975	.150	.196	.181	.377	0.21%
1976	.149	.191	.181	.371	0.27%
1977	.159	.197	.205	.402	0.69%
1978	.148	.183	.188	.370	0.35%
1979	.151	.183	.191	.374	0.40%
1980	.162	.201	.204	.405	0.38%
1981	.150	.190	.187	.377	0.32%
1982	.151	.184	.190	.375	0.45%
1983	.146	.180	.180	.360	0.38%
1984	.147	.180	.182	.362	0.41%
1985	.139	.178	.176	.354	0.47%
1986	.144	.181	.191	.372	0.62%
1987	.151	.188	.199	.387	0.68%
1988	.134	.164	.169	.334	0.34%
1989	.139	.177	.178	.355	0.42%
1990	.138	.173	.171	.344	0.36%
1991	.145	.188	.176	.364	0.31%
1992	.138	.166	.171	.337	0.29%
1993	.151	.182	.185	.367	0.36%
1994	.154	.185	.189	.374	0.21%
1995	.148	.186	.192	.378	0.48%
1996	.148	.184	.189	.373	0.47%
1997	.138	.175	.175	.350	0.36%
1998	.146	.186	.183	.369	0.36%
1999	.147	.187	.189	.376	0.52%
2000	.147	.184	.192	.375	0.60%
2001	.143	.175	.183	.358	0.51%
2002	.148	.179	.191	.370	0.51%

Well, everything has stayed about the same since 1994. However, home runs have increased.

Now, let's look at the numbers by percentage of all of the batters' stats to see if that is just an aberration:

Year	BA%	OBP%	SLUG%	OPS%	HR/AB%
1970	57.49%	57.83%	49.81%	53.48%	27.81%
1971	59.65%	59.64%	51.48%	55.27%	28.93%
1972	59.99%	59.42%	51.89%	55.41%	25.08%
1973	58.29%	58.74%	49.92%	53.99%	24.17%
1974	64.28%	64.17%	55.37%	59.49%	19.07%
1975	58.12%	59.89%	48.41%	53.77%	10.47%
1976	58.52%	59.55%	50.05%	54.51%	15.71%
1977	60.10%	59.72%	51.10%	54.99%	27.20%
1978	57.55%	56.48%	49.58%	52.76%	16.92%
1979	56.70%	55.47%	48.08%	51.43%	16.50%
1980	61.04%	61.61%	52.70%	56.77%	17.56%
1981	58.58%	59.39%	50.64%	54.71%	17.07%
1982	57.73%	56.85%	48.98%	52.56%	19.09%
1983	56.15%	55.46%	46.27%	50.45%	16.58%
1984	56.70%	55.71%	47.32%	51.15%	17.91%
1985	54.26%	55.13%	45.01%	49.59%	18.59%
1986	56.00%	55.53%	48.43%	51.64%	23.17%
1987	57.37%	56.84%	47.87%	51.85%	21.86%
1988	52.53%	51.74%	44.80%	47.97%	15.38%
1989	54.70%	55.53%	47.31%	51.09%	19.58%
1990	53.69%	53.16%	44.47%	48.44%	15.63%
1991	56.72%	58.15%	45.79%	51.44%	12.94%
1992	53.94%	51.58%	45.21%	48.14%	13.73%
1993	57.12%	54.83%	45.92%	49.95%	13.71%
1994	57.19%	54.54%	44.64%	49.04%	6.90%
1995	55.58%	55.04%	46.05%	50.07%	16.46%
1996	54.74%	54.03%	44.27%	48.60%	14.82%
1997	51.72%	51.93%	41.76%	46.29%	12.00%
1998	54.81%	55.61%	43.56%	48.91%	12.01%
1999	54.27%	54.31%	43.60%	48.34%	15.65%
2000	54.49%	53.25%	43.81%	47.97%	17.69%
2001	54.34%	52.54%	42.99%	47.17%	15.52%
2002	56.47%	54.02%	45.94%	49.52%	16.85%

Well, pitchers are apparently hitting more home runs today than they were in 1994. However, we are talking about a historic low for pitchers' batting. Pitchers actually hit fewer home runs today relative to all batters than they did 30 years ago. Besides, OPS is down for the last ten years as compared to thirty years ago.

My conclusion is that pitchers are apparently hitting more home runs of late (since 1999) relative to all batters, but it is still historically low.

Part II: Individual Pitcher-Batters

Rob Neyer then lists his all-time great hitting pitchers. He concludes that there are some good-hitting pitchers today, but no Babe Ruths or Wes Ferrells in the bunch.

His list is good, but I thought of two others who should have made it: Rube Bressler and Smokey Joe Wood, both of whom converted from pitcher to the outfield. I thought it might be interesting to see the all-time leaders for pitchers to shed a bit more light on things. (Note that I considered only batters with 100 ABs or more and 50 pitching appearance or more over their careers-i.e., no Jimmie Foxx.).

OK, here are the all-time leaders first by batting average:

Name                BA
Babe Ruth          .342
George Van Haltren .316
Al Spalding        .313
Walter Thornton    .312
Elmer Smith        .310
Otis Stocksdale    .310
Erv Brame          .306
Cy Seymour         .303
Rube Bressler      .301
Tom Parrott        .301
Art Reinhart       .301
Bert Inks          .300

Now, the leaders by home runs:

 Name               HR
Babe Ruth         714
Johnny Lindell     72
George Van Haltren 69
Cy Seymour         52
Wes Ferrell        38
Elmer Smith        37
Bob Lemon          37
Red Ruffing        36
Jack Stivetts      35
Earl Wilson        35
Warren Spahn       35
Bobby Wallace      34
Rube Bressler      32
Dave Foutz         31

Now by HR per AB:

 Name           HR/AB
Babe Ruth      8.50%
Jack Harshman  4.95%
Roric Harrison 4.84%
Earl Wilson    4.73%
Mikeorkins   4.20%
Lou Sleater    3.88%
Clint Hartung  3.70%
Tim Lollar     3.46%
Jerry Casale   3.45%
Wes Ferrell    3.23%
Bob Lemon      3.13%
Danny Murphy   3.08%
Wayland Dean   3.06%

Lollar probably should have made Neyer's list. Casale was a modern player, but only had 116 at-bats.

Finally, here are the all-time leaders by OPS:

Name                OPS
Babe Ruth         1.164
Elmer Smith        .832
George Van Haltren .802
Wes Ferrell        .797
Rube Bressler      .791
Bob Caruthers      .791
Jack Stivetts      .783
Johnny Lindell     .773
Walter Thornton    .771
Doc Crandall       .770
Chad Kimsey        .768
Joe Wood           .768
Tom Parrott        .768
Erv Brame          .755
Cy Seymour         .752
Reb Russell        .745
Jimmy Zinn         .745
Ralph Winegarner   .735
Charlie Ferguson   .735
Ad Gumbert         .731
Walt Kinney        .727
Fred Klobedanz     .726
Otis Stocksdale    .724
Snake Wiltse       .724
George Uhle        .722
Jack Bentley       .722
Schoolboy Rowe     .710
Al Spalding        .705
Don Newcombe       .705
Dave Foutz         .701

Here are a lot of 19th-century pitchers in there. Here are the "modern" pitcher-batters:

Johnny Lindell came up during World War II with the Yankees as a pitcher, quickly converted to an outfielder, and then finished his career as a pitcher.

Doc Crandall, who is on a short list of the "first" relief pitchers, was a contemporary of Ruth's. He played middle infield occasionally throughout his career, probably more for his bat (OPS 20% than league average) than his markedly subpar glove.

Chad Kimsey was a good-hitting pitcher for the Browns in the Thirties.

Erv Brame was a decent-hitting pitcher for the Pirates in the late Twenties and early Thirties.

Reb Russell was a pitcher in the 1910s who converted to outfielder in the Twenties for the White Sox. He had an OPS 76% better than the league average in his first season as an outfielder.

Jimmy Zinn was a decent-hitting journeyman pitcher in the Twneties.

Ralph Winegarner was a poor-man's Bob Lemon: he came up in 1930 as third baseman, went back down for a couple of years, and returned to the majors as a pitcher.

Walt Kinney was a good hitter for the A's in the early Twenties. He also made a handful of appearances in the outfield.

George Uhle was a decent hitter who won 200 games in the Twenties and Thirties. He made Neyer's list.

Jack Bentley was a backup pitcher for McGraw's Giants in 1910s. He played one year for the Phillies almost exclusively as a first baseman. And then finished his career as a pitcher for the Giants again.

Schoolboy Rowe and Don Newcombe were honorable mentions on Neyer's list.


Comment status: comments have been closed. Baseball Toaster is now out of business.