Baseball Toaster Mike's Baseball Rants
This is my site with my opinions, but I hope that, like Irish Spring, you like it, too.
Frozen Toast
Google Search
Mike's Baseball Rants


10  09  07 
06  05  04  03 

12  11  10  09  08  07 
06  05  04  03  02  01 

12  11  10  09  08  07 
06  05  04  03  02  01 

12  11  10  09  08  07 
06  05  04  03  02  01 

12  11  10  09  08  07 
06  05  04  03  02  01 

12  11  10  09  08  07 
06  05  04  03  02  01 

12  11  10  09  08  07 
Links to MBBR
The Return of the Five-Ball Walk? (And Other Tales of Phillies Woe)
2005-09-27 23:15
by Mike Carminati

In 1889 baseball changed the definition of a base on balls, making four balls the basis for a free pass to first. Walks shot up 55% that year, the highest increase since the founding of the National League.

The five-ball walk has been dead for 116 years, but for a time in Philadelphia tonight, it seemed that baseball had brought it back. With the Phils trailing the Metsgoes by a run (3-2), the bases empty and two outs in the bottom of the ninth, Chase Utley stepped into the batter's box and appeared to a called ball on a 3-2 count but remained at bat. The local Phillies broadcasters had the count at 3-2. The scoreboard had a 3-2 count. And the fans, at least the ones that can count, were irate.

How could a ball on 3-2 pitch not result in a walk?

As it turned out Utley walked two pitches later. But it didn't matter when the next batter, Bobby Abreu, K'ed to end the game. All that was left was the academic question of a five-pitch walk, and the Phils were eliminated from the division title hunt in the NL East.

It wasn't until I went through the pitch sequence on MLB.TV with a different broadcast team that I realized that the home-plate ump made the right call:

- Called strike on outside slider, 0-1(I believe this was the one called a ball by the Philly broadcasters and the scoreboard operator).

- Swinging strike on a curve, 0-2

- Fouled off, remains 0-2

- High and Outside, 1-2

- Foul tip in the dirt, remains 1-2

- Ball in the dirt, 2-2

- Fouled down the first base line, remains 2-2, followed by a conference on the mound

- Low change, 3-2 (This was the one that raised the fans' eyebrows.)

- Fouled off on outside fastball, remains 3-2.

- Change inside, walk.

So Phillies fans have no one to blame for the loss. Except for David Bell who stupidly tried to take third when he was on first and pinch-hitter Shane Victorino hit a two-out single with the Phils trailing by a run. It was a close play, but Bell had no business trying for third. With two outs, it's the proverbial boneheaded play. Or maybe they could blame Charlie Manuel for leaving Bell, he of the 16 career stolen bases, in as the tying run.

Anyway, I wondered if the five-ball walk had made an appearance since 1889. I looked in up in Rich Marazzi's The Rules and Lore of Baseball. I found an example with exactly the same two teams:

It was early in the 1978 season when the Mets and Phillies tangled at the Vet in Philadelphia in what must have been a real yawner.

The Mets' Lenny Randle was batting with a count of three balls and two strikes facing Tug McGraw. The next pitch was called a ball, which entitled Randle to take first base. Apparently everyone in the park must have been napping including the umpires because Randle remained in the batter's box instead of talking his "walk" to first.

With the count of four balls and two strikes, Lenny hit McGraw's next pitch for a triple. Do you believe this happened in a major-league game.

Uh, yeah, I do. I'm surprised it hasn't happened more often as a matter of fact.

2005-09-27 23:42:37
1.   deadteddy8
I seem to recall that during Jose Uribe's stint with the Astros, ESPN made fun of everyone losing count and allowing a five-ball walk to happen.
2005-09-28 14:33:39
2.   McFood
I've been at a game where something even worse happened. I'm an A's fan, and back in the late seventies they were the doormats of the league. The worst part was that all the close calls seemed to go the other team's way, especially against the Yanks and the Red Sox, who would pound them with regularity. It seemed as if the umps knew that not too many people would be upset at a bad call against Oakland, but they dare not upset the legions of east coast fans. Anyway, in an uncharacteristically close game between the A's and the BoSox, the A's with a slim lead, and Boston batting with a couple of runners on base, Matt Keough threw strike 3 to perennial A's-Killer Dwight Evans, and everyone in the stadium, including Dewey, who took a step and a half towards the dugout, knew that is was strike 3. Everyone, that is, except the homeplate umpire, who called it strike 2. The A's manager came out and argued, but when they let it stand at strike 2, Keough went ballistic. Somehow, they didn't toss him from the game(probably because deep down they knew they were wrong, but after all, it was only the A's), and after Keough finally settled down, the next pitch he threw was promptly whacked into the right field bleachers for a 3 run homer. Before Evans could even circle the bases, Keough was screaming at the umpire. This time they did run him, but he was probably headed for the showers anyway.

Can you imagine if it'd been Boston-New York? That ump would have been lucky to escape with his life.

Comment status: comments have been closed. Baseball Toaster is now out of business.