Baseball Toaster Mike's Baseball Rants
Help
This is my site with my opinions, but I hope that, like Irish Spring, you like it, too.
Frozen Toast
Search
Google Search
Web
Toaster
Mike's Baseball Rants
Archives

2009
01 

2008
10  09  07 
06  05  04  03 

2007
12  11  10  09  08  07 
06  05  04  03  02  01 

2006
12  11  10  09  08  07 
06  05  04  03  02  01 

2005
12  11  10  09  08  07 
06  05  04  03  02  01 

2004
12  11  10  09  08  07 
06  05  04  03  02  01 

2003
12  11  10  09  08  07 
06  05  04  03  02  01 

2002
12  11  10  09  08  07 
Links to MBBR
Artless Dodgers?
2005-08-23 09:42
by Mike Carminati

I took a look at the Dodgers at the start of the season when they broke from the pack with a 12-2 record. I found that the average final year winning percentage for all teams that start at 12-2 or better was .585 or 95-67 for a 162-game record.

Well, since then the Dodgers have gone 44-66 and now own a 56-68/.452 record, which is good for third place in the NL West, 5 games back in the retrograde division. They are in tenth in the wild card hunt, 10.5 games behind the Astros. Their only bet for a postseason berth is the division title, but they can't expect the division leader to remain under .500 as they switch to intra-divisional games down the stretch.

Basically, they had better win some games, which has been hard for them to do for quite some time. They have not had a winning record since they finished getting swept by the lowly Royals and fell to 33-32 on June 16. Up to that point, they had spent one day (opening day) under .500 all year. Since then they have had one day—the next day when they fell to the ChiSox, 6-0, to start another sweep—at .500 or better. Since the start of that Royal series, Dem Bums haz gone 23-39 (.371).

But how bad is that? Is that the worst that a once 12-2 team finished. Well, no, but it's close. The 1914 Pirates started 12-2 and finished with a slightly lower winning percentage (by 4 points), but the Dodgers can still topple (bottom-le) them.

The 1914 Bucs were actually 21-8 at one May 25. At that point the eventual league champs, the "Miracle" Braves, were 8-19, 12 games back. The Pirates then lost ten games and 15 of 17, at which point they fell to a .500 (23-23) record. From that point forward, they had three days with a winning record. It didn't help that they went 5-17 against the "Miracles"'s and 6-16 against the fifth-place Robins (soon to be Dodgers).

The Pirates are the only one of the 12-2 or better teams to finish more than one standard deviation away from the mean winning percentage (STDDEV is .062). The Dodgers are currently over two standard deviations away from the average.

It can be said that the degree to which the Dodgers reeked after their fast start is quite rare. Here are the final results for all 12-2 or better teams arranged by winning percentage in ascending order:

TmYrWLPCTRSRAExp PCTWLPCTPosPostseason
PIT1914122.8576936.7676985.4487
LA2005122.8579152.7365668.4523
CLE1966131.9294724.7748181.5005
TEX 1989122.8577546.7108379.5124
ATL1982131.9296736.7578973.5491Division Champ
CIN1980122.8576838.7448973.5493
NYG1938122.8578556.6828367.5533
SFG1971122.8577431.8319072.5561Division Champ
MIL1987131.9299260.6869171.5623
CIN1990122.8578548.7409171.5621WS Champ
NYG1918131.9299131.8787153.5732
BRO1940122.8577750.6888865.5752
DET1911122.8577343.7258965.5782
OAK1981131.9297220.9126445.5871Division Champ
PIT1992122.8578038.7969666.5931Division Champ
ATL1994131.9299136.8456846.5962
BAL1966122.8577539.7689763.6061WS Champ
MLN1957122.8577045.6929559.6171WS Champ
SFG2003131.9298453.69910061.6211Division Champ
BRO1955122.8579450.7609855.6411WS Champ
DET1984131.9298440.79510458.6421WS Champ
CHC1907122.8574733.65610745.7041WS Champ
PIT1902122.8579939.84610336.7411NL Pennant
Comments
2005-08-23 09:44:48
1.   Bob Timmermann
It's been a lot of fun to watch! Trust me!
2005-08-23 11:46:48
2.   TFD
I haven't followed the discussion over at DT much this year...but how the hell did the Dodgers turn this season into such an unmitigated DISASTER?!

Blek.

2005-08-23 12:09:14
3.   scareduck
Injuries, mostly, but the rotation has turned into a pumpkin.
2005-08-23 13:44:19
4.   Bob Timmermann
3
Is a good summation and doesn't follow the normal DT position of "It's all Jim Tracy's fault."
2005-08-23 16:09:46
5.   fanerman
I'd say:
mostly injuries (May, June, Drew... causing bad defense, bad offense, bad everything),
some rotation woes (inconsistencies outside of Penny),
some bullpen breakdowns (Gagne injury, Brazoban inconsistencies),
some bad luck
a little Jim Tracy mismanagement (not playing Choi, Perez, Dessens which would slightly mitigate the injuries and bullpen issues).

Referring to 4... DTers feel like that injuries, bad luck, and other things can't be expected or controlled, but Jim Tracy's faults could have been. So they(we) blame Tracy.

2005-08-23 21:56:41
6.   Jon Weisman
4 - please distinguish that in citing the "normal DT position," Bob is referring to some commenters - not the blogger, who sees complexity. 5 is closer.
2005-08-24 01:29:54
7.   Suffering Bruin
In order of importance regarding the Dodgers woes:

1) Injuries.
2) Starting pitchers. Jon on this when the Dodgers were struggling; the starting pitching wasn't very good and nobody was talking about it. It's not talked now because the starters are doing better with the notable exception of Lowe.
3) Inconsistent bullpen.
4) A farm system a mile wide in prospects and six inches deep as far as helping 2005
5) The Drew injury was a killer
6) Nothing at the trade deadline (see 4 above)
7) Jim Tracy's lineups have been puzzling to some, the source of all that is evil to others. I, for one, believe Choi should be receiving more AB's but DTers will tell you I am hardly objective on this issue.
8) Brazoban turned into Todd Worrell
9) Cesar Izturis turned into Alex Cora. Most of the LA media will tell you this is a good thing and finally...
10) Milton Bradley vs. Jeff Kent. Stay tuned...

Comment status: comments have been closed. Baseball Toaster is now out of business.