Baseball Toaster Mike's Baseball Rants
Help
This is my site with my opinions, but I hope that, like Irish Spring, you like it, too.
Frozen Toast
Search
Google Search
Web
Toaster
Mike's Baseball Rants
Archives

2009
01 

2008
10  09  07 
06  05  04  03 

2007
12  11  10  09  08  07 
06  05  04  03  02  01 

2006
12  11  10  09  08  07 
06  05  04  03  02  01 

2005
12  11  10  09  08  07 
06  05  04  03  02  01 

2004
12  11  10  09  08  07 
06  05  04  03  02  01 

2003
12  11  10  09  08  07 
06  05  04  03  02  01 

2002
12  11  10  09  08  07 
Links to MBBR
Where Have All the Gagnes Gone? Pt II
2006-05-03 22:19
by Mike Carminati

Jon Papelbon's season did not start as expected. The Red Sox were ready for him to ascend to the rotation, but after a disappointing spring training (5.06 ERA in a team-leading 21 spring innings), they moved him to the bullpen on March 24. He was expected to fill the long relief role and was to be followed by Mike Timlin and closer Keith Foulke.

In the season opener, Papelbon pitched a perfect ninth in a 7-3 win over the Rangers. Two days later, he picked up his first save striking out two of the three men he faced. It was just his second professional save (the other coming last year with the PawSox, and it should be mentioned that he picked up 7 saves in his last year at Mississippi State).

With David Wells going on the DL in mid-April, he would seem the natural choice to take Wells' spot in the rotation. But, Papelbon had already recorded 5 saves and had pitched six scoreless innings (with 5 Ks, no walks and just 2 hits allowed). So the spot fell to Lenny DiNardo, the Red Sox answer to Lou Merloni on their pitching staff.

He now has a major-league leading ten saves. He still has not given up an earned run in 15.1 innings pitched and has just allowed 7 hits and two walks while striking out 16. His opponents are batting .137 against him. He projects to what would be a major-league record of 62 saves.

Meanwhile, incumbent closer Keith Foulke has taken on a pseudo-lefty spot reliever role even though he is a right-handed pitcher (huh?).

Once upon a time, teams felt the need to come into the season with a strong veteran closer in order to compete for a playoff spot. Actually, that was last winter when the Mets nabbed Billy Wagner from the Phils. Now it seems that teams are ready to hand the job over to any decent-throwing stopgap solution.

Has relief pitching, or at least teams' approach to relief pitching, regressed to the point it had been in the olden days when, as John Thorn said in The Relief Pitcher, "[I]ts image [was] as a rest home for aging starters and as audition studio for green kids"? Just replace "aging starter" with "aging middle reliever".

Well, the first test would be to take a look at the average age of a major-league closer. Keep in mind that I define a closer as the man who was the leader (or co-leader) on his team in saves. The stats are through 2005:

Decade Avg Age
1870s 28.13
1880s 25.00
1890s 25.13
1900s 28.18
1910s 27.19
1920s 28.56
1930s 29.91
1940s 30.74
1950s 30.73
1960s 29.84
1970s 28.55
1980s 28.82
1990s 30.05
2000s 29.87

The average age dip drop in the first six years of this decade. It was the first drop in closer age since the 1970s when closers first became superstars.

So does this mean that given that teams are seemingly handing out closer jobs to youngsters AND aging journeymen? Perhaps a different approach would be more illuminating.

What if we looked at closer retention? That is, how do teams do on average at retaining their closers from year to year? If a team believes in the closer role, they will devote a pitcher with enough talent to last more than one year in the role (data through 2005):

DecadeSameDiff% Same
1870s1233.33%
1880s010.00%
1890s21611.11%
1900s135419.40%
1910s4119117.67%
1920s3620415.00%
1930s5519122.36%
1940s5116623.50%
1950s5314227.18%
1960s7312337.24%
1970s9017134.48%
1980s13314947.16%
1990s14113750.72%
2000s8410045.65%
Total773164731.94%

Again we see the numbers dipping for the current decade. Teams are retaining their closers at a lower rate than they had for the past two decades.

Maybe, you'll point out, that is just a function of higher turnover in general. Billy Wagner, for example, went from Philly to New York but remained a closer throughout. He changed teams via free agency because he was in demand not because the Phils lost faith in him as a closer.

Here are the breakdowns per decade of how well closers retained their role, if not their team, from year to year:

DecadeCloser Prev YrTotal%
1870s1812.50%
1880s0170.00%
1890s3535.66%
1900s149414.89%
1910s4420621.36%
1920s3819619.39%
1930s5920029.50%
1940s5718730.48%
1950s6217834.83%
1960s8620342.36%
1970s10925542.75%
1980s14827154.61%
1990s17828163.35%
2000s10418356.83%
Total903233238.72%

This shows the numbers were affected by higher turnover per team on the closer role. However, it does show that closers in general lose their jobs more often than in the previous decade.

Another trend we are seeing is that a team will rely on a player who had been a closer in the past. Guys like Tom Gordon, Joe Borowski, and Tim Worrell are returning to the closers job after a hiatus. How often, historically, do teams turn to veterans who may not have been a closer in the previous season? Here are the numbers:

Decade#No Prev ExpTotal%
1870s35837.50%
1880s017170.00%
1890s10435318.87%
1900s30649431.91%
1910s8911720643.20%
1920s9410219647.96%
1930s1059520052.50%
1940s919618748.66%
1950s898917850.00%
1960s1238020360.59%
1970s15510025560.78%
1980s1789327165.68%
1990s2047728172.60%
2000s1226118366.67%
Total12931039233255.45%

Again there's a severe decline this decade.

You may point out that this decade accounts for just six seasons given that the current season is barely underway. Maybe these trends will reverse over the entire decade.

Let's look at the closers per team from 2005-06 (stats through Tuesday's games). First, here are the closers for the past two seasons per team:

TM2005 CloserTeamSVSVAge2006 CloserSvAge
ARIJose Valverde451525Jose Valverde726
ATLChris Reitsma381527Chris Reitsma628
BALB.J. Ryan383629Chris Ray724
BOSKeith Foulke381532Jonathan Papelbon1025
CHADustin Hermanson543432Bobby Jenks825
CHNRyan Dempster393328Ryan Dempster729
CINDave Weathers311535Dave Weathers836
CLEBob Wickman514536Bob Wickman537
COLBrian Fuentes373129Brian Fuentes530
DETFernando Rodney37928Todd Jones538
DETUgueth Urbina37931
FLOTodd Jones424037Joe Borowski335
HOUBrad Lidge454228Brad Lidge929
KCAMike MacDougal252128Ambiorix Burgos222
LAAFrancisco Rodriguez544523Francisco Rodriguez824
LANYhency Brazoban402125Danys Baez828
MILDerrick Turnbow463927Derrick Turnbow928
MINJoe Nathan444330Joe Nathan331
NYAMariano Rivera464335Mariano Rivera436
NYNBraden Looper382830Billy Wagner734
OAKHuston Street382321Huston Street422
PHIBilly Wagner403833Tom Gordon838
PITJose Mesa352739Mike Gonzalez328
SDNTrevor Hoffman454337Trevor Hoffman438
SEAEddie Guardado393634Eddie Guardado435
SFNTyler Walker462329Tim Worrell638
SLNJason Isringhausen483932Jason Isringhausen733
TBADanys Baez434127Dan Miceli435
TEXFrancisco Cordero463730Francisco Cordero331
TEX Akinori Otsuka334
TORMiguel Batista353134B.J. Ryan530
WASChad Cordero514723Chad Cordero224
Avg30.1330.68

Here are the numbers for the categories we looked at above: whether the man was the closer on the same team in the previous year, whether he was a closer for some team in the previous season, and whether he closed previously though not necessarily in the previous year:

TMSame Closer?CL in 2005?CL prev yr?
ARIYYY
ATLYYY
BALNNN
BOSNNN
CHANNN
CHNYYY
CINYYY
CLEYYY
COLYYY
DETNYY
DETN
FLONNY
HOUYYY
KCANNN
LAAYYY
LANNYY
MILYYY
MINYYY
NYAYYY
NYNNYY
OAKYYY
PHINNY
PITNNN
SDNYYY
SEAYYY
SFNNNY
SLNYYY
TBANNY
TEXYYY
TEXNNN
TORNYY
WASYYY
Sum172125
Total323131
PCT53.13%67.74%80.65%

All of these trends are reversing in the ongoing season. Whether that's a full reversal or just dumb luck is yet to be seen. However, it seems to belie what we thought we knew about closer use this season, Jon Papelbon notwithstanding.

So what does it mean? Baseball has seemed to be on the cusp of another reinvention of the closer role for a few seasons. Bill James' so-called "bullpen by committee" approach in Boston failed. The super closer in the Gagne mold has lost resonance since Eric Gagne became the new Mark Fidrych.

So it seems that what we are seeing is a lot of flux this decade. Whether it will lead anywhere remains to be seen.

Comments
2006-05-03 23:19:49
1.   das411
Can we call this "The Bobby Jenks Effect"?
2006-05-04 08:19:23
2.   Shaun P
1 Everyone does like to copy a big winner.

Comment status: comments have been closed. Baseball Toaster is now out of business.