Number selected: 1
Percentage by Top Win Shares: 100.00%
Percentage based on bypassed: 100.00%
Percentage by Grade: 100.00%
Percentage by Grade bypassed: 100.00%
Percentage elected over 300 Win Shares? 100.00%
Percentage better than the established standards for the Hall (336.49 WS avg)? 100.00% (Five others qualified.)

Number selected: 2
Percentage by Top Win Shares: 0.00%
Percentage based on bypassed: 9.09%
Percentage by Grade: 50.00%
Percentage by Grade bypassed: 7.50%
Percentage elected over 300 Win Shares? 50.00%
Percentage better than the established standards for the Hall (336.49 WS avg)? 0.00% (Seven qualified.)

(By the way, Joe Jackson, 294 WS, was no longer eligible due to the rule change to bar players on the permanently ineligible list, i.e., Pete Rose.)

Number selected: 0
Percentage by Top Win Shares: N/A
Percentage based on bypassed: N/A
Percentage by Grade: N/A
Percentage by Grade bypassed: N/A
Percentage elected over 300 Win Shares? N/A
Percentage better than the established standards for the Hall (336.95 WS avg)? N/A (Five qualified.)

Number selected: 1
Percentage by Top Win Shares: 0.00%
Percentage based on bypassed: 1.59%
Percentage by Grade: 0.00%
Percentage by Grade bypassed: 1.25%
Percentage elected over 300 Win Shares? 0.00%
Percentage better than the established standards for the Hall (336.95 WS avg)? 0.00% (Seven qualified.)

(By the way, Joe Jackson, 294 WS, was no longer eligible due to the rule change to bar players on the permanently ineligible list, i.e., Pete Rose.)

Number selected: 1
Percentage by Top Win Shares: 100.00%
Percentage based on bypassed: 100.00%
Percentage by Grade: 100.00%
Percentage by Grade bypassed: 100.00%
Percentage elected over 300 Win Shares? 100.00%
Percentage better than the established standards for the Hall (336.49 WS avg)? 100.00% (Five others qualified.)

Number selected: 1
Percentage by Top Win Shares: 0.00%
Percentage based on bypassed: 5.00%
Percentage by Grade: 100.00%
Percentage by Grade bypassed: 5.00%
Percentage elected over 300 Win Shares? 100.00%
Percentage better than the established standards for the Hall (336.49 WS avg)? 0.00% (Eight qualified.)

Number selected: 1
Percentage by Top Win Shares: 0.00%
Percentage based on bypassed: 8.33%
Percentage by Grade: 0.00%
Percentage by Grade bypassed: 8.33%
Percentage elected over 300 Win Shares? 100.00%
Percentage better than the established standards for the Hall (336.52 WS avg)? 0.00% (Six qualified.)

Number selected: 2
Percentage by Top Win Shares: 50.00%
Percentage based on bypassed: 2.13%
Percentage by Grade: 50.00%
Percentage by Grade bypassed: 4.55%
Percentage elected over 300 Win Shares? 50.00%
Percentage better than the established standards for the Hall (336.52 WS avg)? 50.00% (Seven others qualified.)

(By the way, Joe Jackson, 294 WS, was no longer eligible due to the rule change to bar players on the permanently ineligible list, i.e., Pete Rose.)

Number selected: 3
Percentage by Top Win Shares: 66.67%
Percentage based on bypassed: 30.00%
Percentage by Grade: 100.00%
Percentage by Grade bypassed: 27.27%
Percentage elected over 300 Win Shares? 100.00%
Percentage better than the established standards for the Hall (336.38 WS avg)? 66.67% (Ryan just missed. Seven others qualified.)

Number selected: 1
Percentage by Top Win Shares: 0.00%
Percentage based on bypassed: 5.88%
Percentage by Grade: 100.00%
Percentage by Grade bypassed: 5.88%
Percentage elected over 300 Win Shares? 100.00%
Percentage better than the established standards for the Hall (336.38 WS avg)? 0.00% (Seven qualified.)

Number selected: 2
Percentage by Top Win Shares: 50.00%
Percentage based on bypassed: 50.00%
Percentage by Grade: 100.00%
Percentage by Grade bypassed: 50.00%
Percentage elected over 300 Win Shares? 100.00%
Percentage better than the established standards for the Hall (337.23 WS avg)? 100.00% (Five others qualified.)

Number selected: 1
Percentage by Top Win Shares: 0.00%
Percentage based on bypassed: 5.56%
Percentage by Grade: 100.00%
Percentage by Grade bypassed: 5.56%
Percentage elected over 300 Win Shares? 100.00%
Percentage better than the established standards for the Hall (337.23 WS avg)? 0.00% (Seven qualified.)

Number selected: 2
Percentage by Top Win Shares: 50.00%
Percentage based on bypassed: 3.45%
Percentage by Grade: 50.00%
Percentage by Grade bypassed: 8.00%
Percentage elected over 300 Win Shares? 50.00%
Percentage better than the established standards for the Hall (337.28 WS avg)? 50.00% (Six others qualified.)

Number selected: 1
Percentage by Top Win Shares: 0.00%
Percentage based on bypassed: 0.66%
Percentage by Grade: 0.00%
Percentage by Grade bypassed: 0.00%
Percentage elected over 300 Win Shares? 0.00%
Percentage better than the established standards for the Hall (337.28 WS avg)? 0.00% (Seven qualified.)

Number selected: 1
Percentage by Top Win Shares: 0.00%
Percentage based on bypassed: 10.00%
Percentage by Grade: 100.00%
Percentage by Grade bypassed: 10.00%
Percentage elected over 300 Win Shares? 100.00%
Percentage better than the established standards for the Hall (336.77 WS avg)? 0.00% (Seven qualified.)

Number selected: 0
Percentage by Top Win Shares: N/A
Percentage based on bypassed: N/A
Percentage by Grade: N/A
Percentage by Grade bypassed: N/A
Percentage elected over 300 Win Shares? N/A
Percentage better than the established standards for the Hall (336.77 WS avg)? N/A (Seven qualified.)

Number selected: 2
Percentage by Top Win Shares: 50,00%
Percentage based on bypassed: 22.22%
Percentage by Grade: 100.00%
Percentage by Grade bypassed: 26.32%
Percentage elected over 300 Win Shares? 100.00%
Percentage better than the established standards for the Hall (336.70 WS avg)? 100.00% (Seven others qualified.)

Number selected: 0
Percentage by Top Win Shares: N/A
Percentage based on bypassed: N/A
Percentage by Grade: N/A
Percentage by Grade bypassed: N/A
Percentage elected over 300 Win Shares? N/A
Percentage better than the established standards for the Hall (336.70 WS avg)? N/A (Seven qualified.)

Number selected: 2
Percentage by Top Win Shares: 50.00%
Percentage based on bypassed: 9.52%
Percentage by Grade: 100.00%
Percentage by Grade bypassed: 11.63%
Percentage elected over 300 Win Shares? 100.00%
Percentage better than the established standards for the Hall (336.70 WS avg)? 50.00% (Seven others qualified.)

Number selected: 0 (There is no election this year.)
Percentage by Top Win Shares: N/A
Percentage based on bypassed: N/A
Percentage by Grade: N/A
Percentage by Grade bypassed: N/A
Percentage elected over 300 Win Shares? N/A
Percentage better than the established standards for the Hall (336.70 WS avg)? N/A (Seven qualified.)

So there you have it. There are currently 14 men with Win Share totals greater than the Hall of Fame average, seven per committee. And neither one seems in a hurry to elect any of them. Well, perhaps that’s an overstatement: the writers seem to be moving toward electing Sandberg at some point and Dawson and Blyleven have some strong support. However, the other four over the Hall average Win Share total are not even on the ballot any longer and will have to wait until the veterans committee is an option. Dick Allen also has some support on the vets committee, but who knows if they’ll ever be able to elect anyone in their current configuration.

Next, I will have a final assessment and my means for fixing this mess.

By the way, Rich’s Weekend Baseball BEAT has a good overview of the Blyleven snubbing. (That is, if anyone has made it all the way through all of these posts.)